In an uncommon flip of occasions, the supervisory board on Tuesday rejected a proposal to ban smoking or vape tobacco in residences it voted for final week.
The council should approve the laws in two separate votes. Usually, the second vote is superficial.
However not this time. Supervisors have determined to not approve Board Chairman Norman Yee's proposed ban on smoking in residences in his second vote after approving the proposal final week by a 10-1 vote.
In a 6-5 vote, the council voted to ship the invoice to committee. The movement was contested by Yee together with supervisors Ahsha Safai, Catherine Stefani, Sandra Fewer and Rafael Mandelman.
Supervisor Dean Preston was the one one to vote towards the legislation final week, after highlighting considerations raised by tenant advocates such because the Housing Rights Committee concerning the impacts it might have on long-term tenants, together with fines of as much as $ 1000 per day and the potential for tenant harassment. The proposal says a violation can’t be grounds for eviction.
Preston launched a movement final week to ship the invoice to a committee of council for additional debate, however he failed in a 6-5 vote.
However this time, supervisor Aaron Peskin, who opposed Preston's movement final week, supplied to ship it to committee himself. Peskin mentioned he had heard many long-term fixed-income tenants elevating considerations concerning the proposal since his vote and was "remarkably moved final week by what I had heard from them '.
"I’m actually anxious that the unintended impacts will now not hurt long-term tenants in my district and different districts," Peskin mentioned. "I need to struggle the harms of second-hand smoke in multi-unit residential buildings, however I feel there are higher methods to deal with this."
Preston famous final week that the ban would possible primarily affect long-term tenants who signed leases earlier than it turned the norm for landlords to place no-smoking provisions in them. agreements.
Fewer had steered that council approve the proposal and ask Peskin to "assessment and refine protections for tenants" later.
“Second-hand smoke in residence buildings is a really actual downside,” Fewer mentioned. "I’ve heard many tenants in my neighborhood additionally discuss concerning the cigarette smoke that permeates their hallways and residence buildings day by day."
Yee's proposal additionally sparked backlash within the hashish business, because it initially prohibited smoking of tobacco and hashish in residences.
Earlier than voting for the proposal final week, the council modified the laws towards Yee's will with an modification by Supervisor Rafael Mandelman to exempt hashish smoke from the ban. Mandelman sided with advocates who mentioned town shouldn’t take away the precise to smoke hashish in residences as a result of it’s prohibited to smoke in public, not like tobacco.
The board vote change apparently took Yee abruptly. Simply 4 days in the past, he emailed his constituents an e-mail e-newsletter through which he hailed the smoking ban as "a considerable step in the precise route to make sure that each particular person and each household – regardless from their place of residence or earnings – has clear air to breathe in his own residence.
San Francisco would have turn out to be the most important metropolis within the nation to enact a ban on smoking in multi-unit buildings, Yee mentioned.
In a press release after the vote, Yee mentioned he was "disillusioned".
"At present's vote didn’t prioritize the well being of probably the most susceptible members of our neighborhood," Yee mentioned. "It’s fully the other way up that we’d defend the precise of individuals to smoke of their houses fairly than the precise of others to breathe safely."
Information from the San Francisco Bay Space
If you happen to discover our journalism helpful and related, please take into account becoming a member of our Examiner Membership Program.
Study extra about www.sfexaminer.com/be a part of/