Why these pop-up cycle lanes could but cease useless on the Manchester border


Momentary cycle lanes being funded utilizing a part of a £3m authorities ‘lively journey’ grant are set to cease useless on the boundary with Manchester amid a continued dispute between native authorities.

An inner row has been rumbling for weeks between the town’s management and outlying boroughs, specifically Tameside and Stockport, the place councils are planning £356,000 value of pop-up lanes main in direction of the town subsequent door.

Manchester has determined to spend its personal money on pedestrian schemes within the metropolis centre as a substitute, nonetheless, which means that whereas it has promised to ‘work with’ neighbouring areas, it stays unclear how the lanes will join into the town.

This morning it was confirmed that Higher Manchester had secured an preliminary £three.1m from the federal government’s ‘emergency lively journey fund’, meant as a solution to shortly capitalise on elevated strolling and biking in the course of the lockdown and to make use of street area in a inventive manner whereas public transport use is restricted on account of Covid-19.

Manchester says it desires to individually work on completely filling gaps within the current cycle community throughout the town

That will probably be spent on a mixture of tasks throughout each borough within the area. A second bid for £12.7m of schemes is because of be submitted by mid-August.

In Stockport, the primary wave of confirmed tasks features a £56,000 short-term cycle lane working parallel to the A6 in direction of Manchester, whereas in Tameside the same £300,000 route is deliberate alongside Lord Sheldon Means and thru Audenshaw, once more headed in direction of the town.

Each councils imagine the transfer will give commuters a inexperienced various at a time when the usage of public transport is harder on account of social distancing.

Nevertheless Manchester’s tasks don’t embody a continuation of these lanes, which means Stockport’s route at present stops useless at Levenshulme and Tameside’s will finish at Openshaw, 5 miles from the town centre.

Manchester city corridor has justified its personal preliminary tasks – a £75,000 pedestrian and cycle zone on Deansgate, plus different pedestrianisation tasks within the Northern Quarter and round London Street – on the idea that individuals want further area to confidently transfer round and socially distance within the metropolis centre.

READ  Highland companies be a part of forces for cycle journey in help of Maggie's Highlands

Cllr Angeliki Stogia on the pedestrian and cycle zone in Deansgate

Its transport lead Angeliki Stogia mentioned final month that pop-up lanes had been ‘not a magic bullet’, additionally arguing that taking street area out of main arterial routes would see a return to congestion far more shortly.

As an alternative Manchester says it desires to individually work on completely filling gaps within the current cycle community throughout the town, together with Stretford Street in Hulme and Parsonage Street in Withington.

Regardless of stress each from biking campaigners and next-door boroughs, it has held to that place and the grant allocations in the present day counsel the short-term lanes from Tameside and Stockport might subsequently cease on the metropolis’s border. Though the city corridor has promised to ‘work with’ neighbouring authorities on the problem, it’s not clear what options have thus far been proposed.

The state of affairs has sparked deep irritation in different components of the conurbation, with many political figures past the town seeing it as indicative of Manchester’s perspective in direction of outlying areas.

One identified that such a situation would by no means come up in London, as a result of Transport for London would make certain schemes had been coordinated throughout the town.

A mock-up of the proposed radial pop-up cycle community exhibiting the place the routes would finish at Manchester’s boundaries.

However in Higher Manchester, every council has drawn up its personal priorities for the fund – which means that whereas Transport for Higher Manchester assesses their proposals, every borough can put ahead what it desires.

“In London, you wouldn’t get a lane going by way of Westminster and stopping at Lambeth,” they mentioned.

“However it solely takes the borough within the center right here to say ‘we’ve acquired totally different priorities’ and the entire thing falls down. It’s a farce.

“For a metropolis area that tries to fashion itself as England’s second metropolis, the very fact the town of Manchester doesn’t actually give any consideration to individuals who dwell within the outer boroughs doesn’t look like a second metropolis mentality.”

READ  Nexzu Mobility eyeing world market; in talks for e-cycle exports to US, UK » TechnoCodex

The row had already seen Stockport’s Labour lead member for economic system and regeneration David Meller assault Manchester council for sending out a ‘dreadful message’ and Tameside MP Andrew Gwynne tweet that he was ‘indignant’ on the manner Manchester had behaved, arguing that it was ‘endangering lives’.

Within the Home of Lords, Lord Berkeley complained just a few weeks in the past that Higher Manchester’s lively journey proposals had ‘one huge gap within the center’ as a result of the town council ‘gained’t cooperate’.

Labour MP Andrew Gwynne

Nevertheless Manchester sees the criticism as unjustified and believes its plans are each wise and primarily based on evaluation of how individuals are at present trying to journey.

A fortnight in the past, Coun Stogia wrote to Labour councillors accountable for transport suggesting Andy Burnham had tried to push her into utilizing Manchester’s money to increase the pop-up lanes, in opposition to the obtainable proof.

In an electronic mail to them on July 10, seen by the M.E.N, she mentioned the earlier week Mr Burnham had been ‘pushing me to place pop-up cycle lanes in Manchester with out offering any proof of want or present utilization from areas the place they’ve been used as an emergency lively journey measure’, earlier than reiterating that any proposed schemes shouldn’t be ‘imposed from high’ however chosen by particular person authorities.

“I mentioned new journey patterns and proof I’ve seen counsel that individuals journey extra regionally and wish assist on these native journeys relatively than a necessity for commuter bicycle owner provision, and Manchester efforts would focus there,” she continued. 

“Additionally that we’d like a extra knowledgeable dialogue on Emergency Energetic Journey Tranche 2 and that it’s crucial this time that members for transport throughout Higher Manchester focus on what the wants are and what our residents discuss, relatively than have an answer imposed from high.

“No person is as near day after day motion on our highways than exec members for highways so any dialogue on emergency lively journey it is crucial that we give the political steer and are a part of setting the strategic path.”

Higher Manchester continues to be to submit its bids for ‘Tranche 2’ of the fund, anticipated to whole £12.7m, however an inner record of meant schemes seen by the M.E.N. doesn’t embody any proposals to proceed the cycle lanes over the town border.

READ  Brighton and Hove Information » Extra cycle lanes on the best way, prompting Conservative calls for correct analysis

Coun Stogia mentioned Manchester’s Tranche 2 bid would ‘construct on the numerous work which has already been finished throughout the town to create extra street area for folks – making circumstances safer for our residents as they return to work or go to companies whereas social distancing stays a vital requirement’.

Requested concerning the council’s strategy to pop-up lanes, she mentioned: “Our strategy to the emergency reallocation of street area is to prioritise the necessity for a lot of 1000’s of pedestrians to get round whereas nonetheless having the ability to socially distance, for so long as that is required. 

“That is completely important if we’re to assist restore confidence that individuals can come again to our metropolis centre and busy district centres.

An inner row has been rumbling for weeks between the town’s management and outlying boroughs

“That is why we’ve got been widening footways throughout the town and creating new short-term traffic-free zones at busy metropolis centre areas.

“We’ve an obligation to contemplate all street customers and native companies earlier than taking motion which might have a serious impact on our highways community. Some pop-up cycle measures in Higher Manchester have already needed to be eliminated, due to the congestion they precipitated. They aren’t a magic bullet which will probably be profitable in each state of affairs, or which will be put in efficiently on each street.

“All of us need the identical factor – extra folks to cycle and stroll the place attainable, as a substitute of driving – and we’re being daring and taking pressing motion, with a concentrate on long-term, lasting change in direction of lively journey and away from the automotive, by way of a serious funding in high-quality, protected, everlasting biking and strolling infrastructure.

“On the identical time, we should take native communities and companies with us once we need to make huge modifications to our roads and this implies cautious planning and session is important.”


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here